Share!

Web Design: Reboot, or Just Upgrade Instead?

Change is always hard, and knowing when to upgrade or redesign is among the most critical events in a site’s history. A successful transition from old to new will revitalise a community, give renewed interest in your content or perhaps better portray your services. A poorly thought through redesign may cause your current user base to consider going to your competitors instead. As such, we need to highlight the methods we use within upgrades and that may hold the longevity your site requires.

Web Design: Reboot, or Just Upgrade Instead?

Time for Something New

Whenever you begin walking the pathway towards a website redesign, the initial question which makes itself apparent is whether to start from scratch and come up with something totally fresh and new (which hopefully will appeal to your existing audience) or whether to take the website you have already and implement a wide series of changes and tweaks to optimize the existing experience. Both have their advantages and disadvantages but as is often the case, things aren’t quite clear cut.

Time for Something New

Figure 1: Whichever route you go down, your visitors should be at the forefront of your mind.

In the search for a direction to take, we must examine the benefits and pitfalls which each of those methods bring as there isn’t a solution which is perfect for every website. Arguably if we look at the statistics the idea of a total redesign is more appealing with smaller websites due to the dynamic nature of their audience, but with larger especially corporate institutions the trend is to patch and stretch the existing design to the limits which can be afforded. Both are of general equal popularity.

When to Reboot

The trend of rebooting a website is based around the concept of scrapping everything that appears on the screen visually whilst saving useful content and features and reloading a brand new design which matches the increased needs of that audience. Arguably with most cases (except for the more neurotic of designers and artists), redesigns are usually less frequently implemented than upgrades and tend to have the biggest impact both in general recognition and in usability considerations.

When to Reboot

Figure 2: A complete redesign can either be a great success or an epic failure (in equal quantities).

In respect to the best time to reboot, the generally accepted methodology would be to apply a fresh new look layout that will dazzle your audience only at a stage where it can be agreed upon that a rebrand is necessary. The act of changing your layout should be seen as an attempt to seek a fresh audience whilst ensuring your existing crowd will be happy with the new design or as a method to revitalize a community that has grown tired of a layout which is riddled with troublesome issues.

When rebooting a website design, it’s essential that you gauge your existing audience to seek out not only what they would like to see in a fresh revamped design, but you get the general seal of approval from those individuals by majority to ensure that what you have created will not seem like a backward step or do something to put people off your work. Such revamps should also be implemented only on an infrequent basis as people do not enjoy learning a new layout every week!

When to Upgrade

The trend of upgrading a website is based around the concept of taking the existing time, money and effort that exists from a previous web design and making fundamental core changes which remove existing issues and integrate new functionality whilst retaining the general layout and design. With these upgrades, the method of distributing and applying said fixes usually occurs on a more frequent basis and an emphasis is placed on gradual and consistent upgrades that won’t confuse the visitor.

When to Upgrade

Figure 3: Small planned upgrades can be a great idea – that is until something goes wrong live!

As for the best time to upgrade, while reboots focus on heavy changes which are implemented on an infrequent basis (think Internet Explorer release cycles) the upgrade process is more of a gradual and subtle process which shouldn’t impact your users too much (think Google Chrome release cycles). The implementation issues that may arise come as a result of the frequency and speed of those upgrades as visitors may not approve of changes made or additional issues may result from updates.

When upgrading a design, it’s essential as with reboots that you consult with your audience to determine the best route forward. Upgrades should firstly be made out of necessity such as the need to fix bugs or make minor resolutions that will improve the experience, then secondly out of enhancement such as improving how something is done and finally out of innovation such as the wish to expand your current infrastructure. It’s not an exact science and should be done with care.

The Best Tool for the Job

There isn’t a perfect solution for everyone and the pros and cons are of equal measure too. While reboots have the biggest impact which can be really beneficial to a needing site, they also carry the biggest risk in that users may not approve of, or be able to use the new site as easily. Picking the best tool for the job requires research and careful planning. In such situations, it pays to consider both options equally and not blindly follow the preferential method you have used in the past.

The process of doing something with an existing website appears a frequent question we have to ask ourselves on a regular basis and knowing what will meet your audience’s needs and demands best can literally make the difference between a business success and failure. While content will always be the main drawing point along with features for your site, the accessibility, usability, information architecture and general design of your work will impact your audience to an immeasurable extent!

Questions: Do you prefer rebooting or upgrading websites? What makes you decide to go one route or the other? What examples of each do you love (or hate)? Please let us know in the comment!

Advertise with us

Author

Alexander Dawson is a freelance web designer, author and recreational software developer specializing in web standards, accessibility and UX design. As well as running a business called HiTechy and writing, he spends time on Twitter, SitePoint’s forums and other places, helping those in need.

  • http://www.jvfconsulting.com Web Design & SEO Services

    I love the term reboot, but usually the sites we see are so bad we do a complete re-design! We have coined a couple terms in the office for the super bad sites, but its top secret. lol

  • http://conversiondesign.de Manuel

    I think it depends on the basis where you start. If you have a solid basis it's better to optimize a site, because things which are good could get lost in a complete redesign.
    But if the basis is too bad you defently have to redesign to have a better basis for optimization.

  • Cheryl

    This is a great article to give to people before they get going on changing their website. Sometimes all that is needed is just a little tweaking. Knowing what you need ahead of time is going to save a lot of headaches for both the website owners and the web designers.

  • http://www.mantywebdesigns.com Jill Manty

    We do some of both. Frankly, sometimes it's easier to just scrap the whole thing. For example, we had a client recently whose entire site was the original design from the '90s. Every single page was an image. Not a lot to salvage there.

    On the other hand, we recently had an insurance agent who had slowly been adding navigation through the years until the site was a jumbled mess. We reskinned the site for a new look, since he was changing of all of his branding, added a video and a tiny bit of content to the home page, reorganized his content and kept the rest of the site pretty much as it was.

    I don't know that I have a preference for which one I prefer to work with. I do know that I DON'T like to handle projects that need to be a reboot but where the client is insistent on an upgrade. I don't like telling them that their old site needs to be put out to pasture, but sometimes it REALLY needs to be put out of it's misery.

  • http://www.vibrant-info.com/ Website Design

    Top Software Company in the IT Industry That Provides professional services in website designing, website development, website maintenance, website redesigning, web promotion, search engine optimization, e-commerce web development, intranet application development, SEO

    Thank you

  • http://www.ndic.com/ santa barbara web design

    This is a very good question to make. In this article, you will learn from the consequences of upgrading or the other way around.

  • http://www.heftelstudios.com Kawika

    Upgrade! Don't reboot unless it's absolutely necessary!

  • http://www.vivoocreative.co.uk Nottingham

    Great post, I like the use of Reboot and upgrade, good way of putting it!

  • http://www.tiltin.nl jenifer

    Indeed ,like this article ,it's showing a good way.

  • http://www.raineight.com Rain8

    We are evaluating this issue at present for our corporate site. As we steadily work to optimize SEO we often find need for changes. In fact in our case we are evaluating turning our corporate site in to more of blog site - emphasizing valuable content, while hawking our services as more of a sidebar. This will allow us to focus on creating value for our users - if they find the content useful and insightful - and happen to need some services, they will see our offer somewhere on the page. Great article!

  • Eileen lonergan

    I love using the term reboot! I think that is great. When deciding which path to take I always start with their seo, do they have some traction that we don't want to risk loosing? If yes, than reboot is probably the best path.

  • http://www.pututik.com pututik

    agree with your article, actually we should use some survey with the user, client and agent. That we can do what kind design can implemented, optimizing regarding SEO just simple if we use valid web script but to be customer oriented is more than that.

  • http://www.loriswebs.com Lorel

    I've noticed Google is slowing down re-indexing when a total redesign occurs so now I change the titles, and other features affecting rank, and wait for those to be indexed, while I'm working on a different layout so the changes appear more gradual.

  • http://www.tacmag.com Thadeu

    It's harder to upgrade a design. But I saw to many problems with bigger sites that pratically rebooted all layout at a single time (Orkut, with its changings, made more people discover Facebook in my country). Google Wave is an example that many new things at a time can scare the users -- a amazing idea but without public approval.

    Small changes, in other hand, make people familiar to new resources of your site. These changes can be scheduled to attract the user to some things new or already existent but less used on your layout.

    I think that layout is much like identity and culture: If changes are need, they need to be accomplished step by step.

  • http://www.aceflex.com AceFlex | e-Business Software

    Regardless the path you take, keep always in mind your audience. We deal with e-business solutions, and visitors of our clients are expecting certain features for easy shopping online all the time. A radically new or upgraded Website must be easy-to-use, SEO optimized and fast loaded. And what is also important, all existing users should not be lost after the new changes. It's better off keeping their loyalty high.

  • http://www.theusmangroup.com Krista Jancik

    I think the first step should be to consider some sort of Usability Testing. Figure out where trouble areas are, ask questions, look into heat-mapping and actual user clicks - then determine if a reboot or redesign are in order.